“America Does Not Do Its Share!”

February 19, 2009

“America…is consistently chastised within the economic development community of experts for not providing foreign aid to poor countries at a level commensurate with its wealth.  We are told, ‘The whole developed world is more generous than the United States.  America does not do its share!’  Somehow, the fact that America performs virtually all the Core’s combat interventions in the Gap counts far less than other countries simply sending money, or–better yet–peacekeepers after the fact.” — Thomas Barnett, The Pentagon’s New Map, p.359.


Twelve Reasons to Love the U.S.A., IV

February 14, 2009

4.  This is the place where dreams can come true.  U.S. newspapers are full of stories that read almost like fairy tales: the son of a laborer who grows up to be a doctor, the stay-at-home mom who turns a hobby into a flourishing business, the immigrant who becomes a movie star and governor.  The United States has long been the country people flock to for the chance to make better lives.  No other country has built a sturdier ladder for people to climb to success.” – William J. Bennett, The American Patriot’s Almanac, p.34.


What Is the Greatest Harm Government Can Do?

February 11, 2009

“The government’s greatest harm may come less in the form of its annual cost to taxpayers and more in its destructive influence on civil society and its institutions, such as the family, church, neighborhoods, and other mediating structures that provide humankind meaningful and life-sustaining support.  A society that wishes to remain free and strong will protect these institutions from governmental overextension and politicization.” — Don Eberly, Restoring the Good Society, p.69


What to Do about Iraq, II

February 11, 2009

Second: Calculate the costs and benefits of pursuing the war in Iraq by looking forward, not backward.  Critics of the war continually attack the Administration for past acts and omissions–for how the war was ’sold’ or planned or run.  Those are important issues, but the current policy question is whether continuing to fight is worth the effort–whether securing the benefits of success, and avoiding the consequences of failure, will be worth the costs yet unpaid.” – Douglas Feith, War and Decision, p.523.


What to Do about Iraq Now, I

February 3, 2009

Prof. Douglas Feith, one of the planners of the Iraq war, deals with this issue in four points.  Here is the first.  
First: Formulate a realistic goal–that is, a reasonable definition of success.  The achievement of stable democracy is not a sensible goal, because it is not likely to be accomplished in the near term.  It may be possible fairly soon, however, for Iraq to reach the point where, despite the inevitable ongoing problems of building a new society, its government can manage its own affairs with only a limited amount of outside help.  That is a realistic goal.” — Douglas Feith, War and Decision, p.522.


Twelve Reasons to Love the U.S.A., III

January 31, 2009

3.  No other country has done a better job of establishing equal rights for all citizens.  Certainly there have been times when the United States has fallen tragically short of its founding principles.  But especially in recent decades, no country has worked harder to eliminate discrimination and protect the rights of minorities.   There are plenty of nations where people’s ethnicity, religion, or gender define them as second-class citizens.  In contrast, America has been a pioneer in striving toward the ideal that all are created equal.” — William J. Bennett, The American Patriot’s Almanac, p.34


Five Strategic Thoughts of the Bush Administration

January 23, 2009

“The Bush Administration’s response to 9/11 was different from that of any previous U.S. administration to a terrorist attack.  It was based on five major thoughts:

First, the foremost purpose of the U.S. response to the attack was not punishment or retaliation but preventing the next attack–a point that argued for quick action to disrupt ongoing terrorist plans.

Second, we were at war with a global terrorist network of Islamist extremist groups, including state and nonstate sponsors–and the next attack might come not from al Qaida but from some other part of the movement.  Our strategy has to target both those groups themselves and their key sources of actual and potential support–operational, logistic, financial, and ideological.

Third, our attackers were bent not on political theater but on mass destruction.  This highlighted the possibility that terrorists might obtain chemical, biological, or nuclear weapons to maximize the death toll.

Fourth, a series of 9/11-type terrorist attacks on the United States could change the nature of our country.  Our national security policy extends beyond simply protecting people or territory.  It includes securing our consitutional system, our civil liberties, and the open nature of our society–’our way of life,’ as President Bush expressed it.

This war aim brought us to the fifth strategic thought: In order to counter this threat successfully, we could not rely on a defensive strategy alone.  The United States has so many rich targets that it would demand extraordinary measures to secure them individually–and the effort to do so would endanger our free and open society.  These considerations necessitated a strategy of initiative and offense–of disrupting the terrorist network abroad.

Taken as a wole, these five thoughts drove the Bush Administration to a strategy that gave weight not just to al Qaida but to terrorists of various stripes–such as Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, who was merely an al Qaida ‘associate’ at the time, and to groups such as Ansar al-Islam and Jemaah Islamiyah, which had trained with al Qaida in Afghanistan, and Hezbollah.” – Douglas Feith, War and Decision, p.507.


Twelve Reasons to Love the U.S.A., II

January 21, 2009

“2.  America really is the land of the free.  There are large parts of the world where people can’t say what they think, learn what they’d like, or even dress the way they want.  There are places where people spend years in jail or disappear if they question their rulers.  Less than half of the world’s population lives in countries where people are truly free.  In this nation, as George Washington put it, the love of liberty is interwoven with every ligament of American hearts.” — William J. Bennett, The American Patriot’s Almanac, p.33.


An Inauguration Prayer

January 20, 2009

Evangelical leader Al Mohler has written a prayer for Pres. Obama.  You may find it here.


Inauguration Day Thoughts

January 20, 2009

Neither my wife nor I supported Sen. Barack Obama in his pursuit of the presidential office.  We were supporters of the other guy (well, Romney at first).  But now that Sen. Obama is hours away from his inauguration, it behooves us to stand in support of him–not necessarily for his positions, but for the symbol that he has become.  The sight of an African American man ascending the most exalted office in this land of the free is a welcome vision.  At last, we who are Americans and allies of America can be proud and thankful of the fact that a segment of the country that has often found itself so haunted by the phantoms of a cruel and discriminatory past can stand tall and proud of their country at last.  They need not fear to call this country their own.  The election of Barack Hussein Obama is evidence to the world that the United States of America works hard to overcome its moral failings, and that it is still a land where justice throbs in the heart of many.  This, in the parlance of Christian theological talk, is common grace at work.  The rise of Sen. Obama to the office of president should stop the wagging lips of America’s critics and show that this nation is not as wretched or far gone as they think it is.  The U.S.A. still remains, in many respects, a model civilization.  A sort of city on a hill.

I have also found some of the conservative responses to Sen. Obama’s election encouraging and civilized. Consider these by Dennis Prager, David HorowitzMona Charen, and Ralph Peters for a start.  None of these people voted for Obama (at least not to my knowledge).  Yet they have responded with great civility and perhaps even a tinge of optimism.  We who call ourselves conservatives should not be sore losers.  We can lose with grace.  We can accept defeat with charity.  Especially if we believe that it is the Lord God himself who exalts and pulls down leaders.

So I wish–no, I pray–that Pres. Obama will succeed in his vocation as the leader of the world’s premier free nation.  The almighty God has called the governments of nations to pursue justice, punish evil, and preserve liberty.  My prayer is that Pres. Obama would do just these things.  I would most likely continue to disagree with him (assuming that he persists in them and that I continue not to see eye-to-eye with them).  However, I would strive to disagree  fairly.  After all, the ninth commandment also applies to the way we speak of our leaders.  What I do not want is a situation where anti-Obamaites can tell pro-Obamaites, ”I told you so.”  The wellbeing of our beloved country is too precious for that sort of partisanship. 

So may the Lord God guide this new leader in paths of wisdom and righteousness.  And may Pres. Obama continue to preserve the great American traditions of courage, justice, liberty, innovation, and generosity.